Let us assist you
with your offshore
structural needs
    Assessment Info
»      June 1, 2006 Deadline
Per NTL No. 2003-G16, June 1, 2006 is the deadline to submit the results of platforms that require a Linear or Non-linear (pushover) Ultimate Strength Analysis to the Minerals Management Service (MMS).

Platforms that did not pass the June 1, 2004 screening phase nor the June 1, 2005 Design Level Analysis phase of the platform assessment process requires for an Ultimate Strength Analysis to be performed  or platform mitigation measures taken.
»      Tips, Tools and FAQs
Web-based engineering tools.

We added a web-based pipe property calculator.  View the data on the screen or select for a PDF file to be generated. Check out our downloads page for more info.
»      Assessment Documents
The links below will direct you to free platform assessment related documents for your use.
»      Assessment References
Pushover References:

Nonlinear Analysis of Offshore Structures by Bjorn Skallerud and Jorgen Amdahl ©2002 - Available at many bookstores.

 



Ultiguide
Prepared by DNV, SINTEF, BOMEL April 1999 - Contact Bente Flatby at DNV.

 

    Search:     
Assessment Services
Axiom Consulting Engineers, LLC has experience in the assessment of fixed offshore platforms.  Whether you need assistance in the screening and classification of your platforms or need an assessment analysis performed, we can work with you.

We have performed assessments on platforms installed in the 1950's as well as ones installed in recent years.  We have assisted firms in the screening of their platforms and platform data gathering.  Need a Level I inspection or field visit to confirm or evaluate damage reported?  Our engineers have hands-on experience to accomplish this for you.
Assessment Analyses
Q: What kind of assessment analyses are there?

A:  There are four different analysis that can be performed. 
Simplified Assessments
Requires minimal or, in most cases, no computer modeling.  A simplified assessment can also be performed during the platform screening phase. This type of assessment requires a few hand calculations, or use of some developed system or program, to justify minor damage, minimal load change, or both. 
 
Design Level Analysis
Computer analysis of the platform using standard allowable stresses and safety factors.  Use of an offshore structural analysis program such as SACS is required.
 
Linear Ultimate Strength Analysis
  (or Linear Global)
Computer analysis of the platform similar to the Design Level Analysis except that removal of safety factors from all equations and taking stresses to mean yield strength is allowed.
 
Non-Linear Ultimate Strength Analysis
  (Pushover or Non-Linear Global)
Most commonly known as a 'pushover'.  This analysis is a non-linear computer analysis allowing structural members to exceed their yield strength and have plastic deformation.  Another feature is the use of joint flexibility at tubular connections greatly increasing their capacity.

Assessment analyses can be performed in the order listed above.  If the structure passes the first method, then no additional analysis is required.  However, if it fails the first one, then you continue to the next one and so on.  One key point is that if you know the structure has substantial damage to primary members or has had many additions that caused large load increase on the structure, then you can jump straight into, say, a push-over analysis without the need to perform the previous three methods.
Why Assess?
Q: Why do I need to perform a platform assessment?

A: Many are asking this very question.  Is it because the MMS requires an assessment on all platforms per NTL No. 2003-G16?  Yes and No!  Yes, it has been mandated; however, as soon as the NTL expires this year (2006), platform assessments will still be required if one or more of the five initiators are ever triggered!
Initiators?
Q: What is an initiator?

A: Section 17 of API RP 2A has five initiators that can trigger the need to perform an assessment.  The initiators are:
Change in personnel status?
Change in facilities?
Deck height adequate?
Load increase by over 10%?
Damage causes more than 10%
  reduction in structural capacity?

Be aware that the combined increase in loading and reduction in capacity due to damage must not exceed 10%!
Advantages?
Q: There can't be any advantages or benefits to this assessment thing, right?

A: YES there are!  Here are some to consider.

(1) During an assessment, you can account for modifications  performed in the past that did not increase wave loading (or global base shear) on the platform.  Note that platforms where modifications involve adding items in the wave zone can NOT be check using the Section 17 criteria.  You can also use this assessment process to catalog all of the changes that many have occurred to the platform.

(2) Ever see those Level I, II, and III inspection reports sitting on office shelves? Well, in order to screen your platforms properly, you should review them to determine if there is reported damage.  At the very least, you should review records from the last few years.  What, You call this a benefit? Yes, since you will now know the condition of your platforms, the damages can be catalogued in a  database and properly addressed in the analysis.


 
Axiom Consulting Engineers, LLC © 2003-2007 | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use     Home | Services | Assessments | Downloads | Contact Us